uddu wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026 21:29=
Russians will be back on negotiation table for the Su-57. I don't think this time, we will go to purchase both planes as suggested in the media. It's either this or that who offer the best deal as per our terms. No one else, is capable of offering such independent deals. It is indeed true that the Tejas is relying on U.S engines necessitating the need to negotiate with the French. The work on Kaveri is said to have started from last year and another news is of a much more powerful Kaveri in work. There is one more geopolitical reason, which could unravel in the years to come, even with these deal happening, hopefully prolonging such an issue or make it appear faster.
The Rafale as the 114 MRFA is almost a near certainty. Dassault has set up MRO facilities for both the engine and the aircraft. Then there is the airframe assembly by TASL. Just scroll through the past few pages of this very thread and you will see all the investments that Dassault has made in India due to the deal reaching near fruition. And Dassault will not make these investments without a firm commitment from the GOI on the purchase on 114 aircraft. Every OEM in the MRFA contest was absolutely firm on a minimum 100 aircraft order to transfer any assembly line to India. Thus I am finding it puzzling with the rona-dhona on Twitter from the Indian defence community.
With the recent visit of virtually anyone important in the UAE government to India, the Rafale has now become a centerpiece of India's foreign policy. This is no longer about just addressing the squadron shortage in the IAF. This has now become a prestige issue for the Govt of India and how it sees itself in the region and in the world. Please understand this post, you do not have to agree with it...but you must understand the dice that India has rolled on the geopolitical board game --->
viewtopic.php?p=2668846#p2668846
What was the latter half of Narendra Modi's Make in India vision that he first announced in May 2020? Make in India,
But for the World! That was the slogan of Atmanirbhar Bharat. So welcome to *THAT* world, almost six years later! Now certainly there is a significant self reliance component for India in there, but there is an even greater inertia within the stakeholders in India against it. However India will overcome it, in due course. Not possible to turn the switch off to the Chandigarh Lobby overnight. It will turn out to an electoral disaster for the Govt and in a democracy, elections determine policies.
To now renege from this contract with Dassault would be a fairly BIG deal and in a negative way. There is a lot tied to the Rafale deal and is not just an agreement between Dassault and our MoD. Apart from the Rafale, the next big ticket item is Project 77, India's very own SSN program. The French are providing assistance on this, but much remains under wraps.
Today the
international-rules-based-order system has been shattered (due to Trump's vision of a "fortress" Western Hemisphere) and India is one of the few nations that can provide stability to the rest of the world via exports. The Rafale line in India will serve not just the IAF, but other regional customers (UAE, Indonesia, etc) as well. The MRO facilities in India, will serve not just the Indian Air Force, but other regional customers. And Rafale in the IAF/IN will serve as a training hub not just for India, but for global Rafale operators. Expect France, Indonesia, UAE, etc to train regularly (i.e. annually) with the IAF/IN in the future. This was Lockheed Martin's marketing playbook for the F-16 (and later F-21) proposal for India. Do you remember the Single Engine thread on BRF?
And this is what I was telling stephen in my reply to him above. This is not something that just sprung out of the blue in the GOI. This has been years - if not a decade - in the making. Anyone important in the GOI has been making regular trips to France - over the years - on this issue. The only thing what has speeded up the process is Op Sindoor. Setting aside Pakistan's bluster (four Rafales shot down), the Rafale performed exceptionally well in Op Sindoor and reinforced Air HQ's belief that they made the right decision with the Rafale. Now that is not to suggest that everything is hunky dory with the Rafale fleet currently in service (i.e. Meteor) and the GOI's playbook (non-escalatory action), but overall the Rafale did perform very well.
With regards to the Su-57, there is also regional politics at play. Giving the Rafale assembly to an entity other than HAL, will give the opposition in India ammunition to hammer the Govt. And HAL is based in Karnataka which is currently ruled by the Congress Party. So the best way to solve that problem, would be to give HAL a line for Su-57 assembly and Super Sukhoi upgrade. This was always the plan of the GOI - two lines (one public i.e. HAL and one private player). TASL has the C-295 and will also get the MTA (Medium Transport Aircraft) contract. If everything pans out as planned, TASL has an exciting future and for the young readers who want to get into the world of aviation in India, check out TASL.
Now 100% this will affect our local programs (Tejas Mk2, AMCA, etc), but this is where we are at right now. It just that the sticker price is a shock to the aam junta, along with France's unwillingness to acquiesce to Indian requests. But these will get sorted out - in due course - between the two. But one thing is true - with India's military acquisitions...it is no longer a budget/monetary issue. It is an issue of priorities.
If you got $35 billion to spend on 114 Rafales, you certainly have money to fund flying test beds and other infrastructure required to test & validate a low bypass turbofan. We just do not want to. I really hope the below is not true, but knowing our babus and other stakeholders, anything is possible....
X-Post from the Tejas Mk1A thread...
viewtopic.php?p=2669451#p2669451
Kakkaji wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026 09:54
I recall seeing a news report recently that the MoD has canceled the plan to develop a 90KN Kaveri Derivative with the involvement of Godrej and L&T. The reason given was that, since the GE404 is such a proven, reliable engine, no point spending money on developing a replacement for it. I don't remember which news site it was on.
Anyone hear anything about this?
TIA
IF YOU SOLVE THE ENGINE, THEN EVERYTHING ELSE (AMCA, TEDBF, TEJAS Mk2, ORCA) WILL FALL INTO PLACE. GET THE TURBOFAN CERTIFIED.