The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Manish_Sharma wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 08:49
Churchill only saw Hitler as a competitor, Churchill was a bigger psychopath genocide
Ken Follet in WINTER OF THE WORLD writes that Churchill started bombing German schools killing children but Hitler resisted reciprocating for six months; & finally retaliated due to immense public pressure
Not saying that churchill is not a violent psychopath, but the book Winter of World is a fictional novel, not a historical book. Also, did not germany start the air war on britain (The Blitz) before their planned invasion across the channel?
It is a persistent claim, often repeated in print and online, that Britain bore no responsibility for launching the strategic bombing of civilians in the Second World War. This is, at best, a misleading summary of events. It contains partial truths, but the overall impression it creates—that Germany began the mutual civilian bombing campaign and Britain merely responded—is historically inaccurate. The record, when read in full, shows that Britain was the first to launch a deliberate strategic bombing raid against civilian targets in the enemy homeland during the Second World War. The German Blitz was a reaction, not a provocation.
Manish_Sharma wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 08:49
Churchill only saw Hitler as a competitor, Churchill was a bigger psychopath genocide
Ken Follet in WINTER OF THE WORLD writes that Churchill started bombing German schools killing children but Hitler resisted reciprocating for six months; & finally retaliated due to immense public pressure
Not saying that churchill is not a violent psychopath, but the book Winter of World is a fictional novel, not a historical book. Also, did not germany start the air war on britain (The Blitz) before their planned invasion across the channel?
No but Follet sticks to facts other than fictional character, as he is MA in History & he corrected himself here from his previous novel 'Jackdaws' where he had done == in Britain & Germany bombing each other's schools, but layer when pointed out he did his own research as a historian & corrected it decade later in WINTER OF THE WORLD
He had even acknowledged his mistake in one interview to french paper
If he had wrongly accused Churchill then Churchill cult (anglos of both right and left) would have buried him.
uddu wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026 14:06
INVESTIGATION UPDATE: Editor “Kautilya3” controls over 20% of the
@HinduAmerican page. Public revision logs show a consistent pattern: this account repeatedly restores the phrase “Hindu nationalist” in the opening paragraph — the text search engines and AI systems display.
Whenever another editor removed or softened the phrase, Kautilya3 restored it within hours, locking in a specific framing.
THREAD
Very slippery guy, this Wikipedia editor. He has a way with words. He relentlessly pushes the case for Kukis in Manipur on Wikipedia. There was an attempt at arbitration on that issue. One woman editor - who herself had a lot of experience as an editor - had complained about this non-NPV, and asked that Kautilya3 be banned permanently. That attempt failed to pass due to Kautilaya3's influence and the cotery operating out of the UK. There is a good chance that he is an Indian-origin professor in a UK university, so are his chemchas (or maybe he is one of the chemchas of Jim boy Whales). There is a good chance that he might even be getting funding from the Wikimedia Foundation for his research on top of having a dog in the fight in Manipur.
Indian because of the name? Those are Pseudo names you can adopt at will. You can be Mullah Vayutuvan. If he is not kicked out means he is an employed Agint, even multiple people utilizing the id to push propaganda against Hindus and India. Also they will not act against Anti-India editors. Only if they become nuisance or seems worthless for their agenda, get's the boot. Else no. Wikipedia is a platform to reinforce the western perception of the world on to the masses without any challenge along with narratives for Agint operations.
