Modi 3.0 - Bharat

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/Vishnu_Jain1/status/1967523027563794619
@Vishnu_Jain1
The sc has stayed important provision sec 3(c) of Waqf amendment act,2025. Firstly the amendment act was itself was incomplete and a little relief which was given by the legislation pertaining to govt properties has also been stayed. The sc has trangressed its powers by staying the statute and this order is discriminatory. On waqf issue i do not agree either by the amendment (completely) or by the sc order. There was no hearing on waqf act, 1995.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

As expected of him. SC in their hands now.
Firecracker ban across country? SC says ‘can’t have a policy just for Delhi’s elite residents’
https://www.financialexpress.com/india- ... s/3975789/
"I was in Amritsar last winter and the pollution there was worse than in Delhi," CJI BR Gavai said while hearing the matter.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

Will Gavai will be the first to be impeached poking his nose into EC area.
Supreme Court warns Bihar SIR process may be annulled if illegalities are found in method
The Supreme Court warned that Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) could be set aside if any illegalities are found in its methodology. The bench emphasized that its final verdict will be comprehensive and apply nationwide. October 7 has been fixed for arguments, with the assumption that the Election Commission follows all legal norms.
Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 9140
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Sachin »

Tanaji wrote:Key provisions of Waqf bill stayed
There are some caveats in the order as per this report. The court said the provision in Section 3(1)(r) that a person has to be practising Muslim for five years to create a waqf “shall remain stayed till rules are framed by the state for providing a mechanism for determining the question as to whether a person has been practising Islam for at least 5 years or not.” . Sec 3(1)(r) has been stayed till Rules are made out by the states. This would most likely to lead a situaition; where BJP strong hold states will bring in a stringent rule to prove one-self a Muslim to donate property to Waqf, where as "secular" states like Kerala would water down the rules and make that even a person drunk & sitting in a bar can just make a statement that he is a Muslim and that is valid proof.

On the reduction of collector's powers to determine the right over property the ruling is that "Unless the issue regarding the title to the Waqf property is not finally decided, no third-party rights can be created against any third party in respect of such properties ". So looks like the SC is batting for another court or tribunal which would be the final deciding authority and not the district collector. The way out for the government would be designate any civil court the power to hear appeals on the decrees from the Waqf Tribunal. Also note that the stay order also says that "no third party rights can be created" which means that the Waqf trust also would not be able alieante the property or allow third parties to claim any rights on the Waqf property when the enquiry is pending.

Also note; Provisions against Waqf by use has not been stayed. SC agreed with the contention of the government that this tactic was used to encroach on government lands. Also now Waqf board also has to follow the rules in the Limitation Act which sets a limit by when a suit to claim a property as Waqf has to be filed in a court. And also this stay is an interim stay. The hearings are not completed and the final decree is yet to be made.
Tanaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5061
Joined: 21 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Tanaji »

Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Tanaji wrote: 15 Sep 2025 21:29 Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….



Tanaji saar,

The whole legislation viz Waqf Act (1953, 1995, 2013) is unconstitutional.

It is a tool to islamise India, this is what gandhi & nehru wanted, and now congress & entire woke eco system is hell bent in doing .

Democracy dies when the unwashed unelected veto the elected.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Tanaji wrote: 15 Sep 2025 21:29 Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….

VI@WA

SC has granted PARTIAL INTERIM STAY on SOME provisions of Waqf Amendment Act, but REFUSES to stay ENTIRE ACT.

Is it a setback to #Modi Sarkar? My Analysis

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO WORRY.

SC refusing outright stay indicates Prima Facie the Law is CONSTITUTIONAL.

Let's dive into details!

SC's ruling on Waqf Amendment Act is a significant victory for the Modi Sarkar, delivering a strong message AGAINST "I$£amist Land Jih@d." Here's how each provision of the ruling strengthens governance, promotes fairness & curbs misuse of Waqf system.

1. Partial Interim Stay on Specific Provisions, Not the Entire Act

Supreme Court's decision to avoid a blanket stay on Waqf Amendment Act is a resounding endorsement of Modi Sarkar's intent to reform Waqf system. By allowing most provisions to stand, SC has signalled confidence in Govt's broader vision to streamline and modernize Waqf management, ensuring it serves public interest. Big Blow to Land Jih@dis.

2. Stay on 5-Year I$£am Practitioner Requirement for Creating a Waqf

It appears to be a big blow to Modi Sarkar, but you need to read ahead how SC has played with Land Jih@dis.

5-YEAR PROVISION STAYED ONLY UNTIL STATE GOVERNMENTS FORMULATE RULES.

So NDA rules States are free to form their own rules, which will definitely align again with Modi Sarkar's Waqf Amendment Act & Land Jih@dis don't even get a chance to cry. About CHINDI ruled States? Let people decide which Govt they want. A NDA Govt that will SAVE their hard-earned & ancestral properties or a CHINDI Govt that will GIFT them away to Land Jih@dis.

3. Stay on the Power of the Collector.

Again seems to be setback, but good in the long run. Instead of concentrating power in the hands of Collector, matter is to be referred to the tribunal. It may become time-consuming, but those who know the power of CONgress formed ecosystem will understand how dangerous it would have been. What if CHINDIs come to power in a State? Every Govt appoints its 'trustworthy' bureaucrats in powerful positions & then you know what decision 'SUCH' Collector will deliver. SC has eliminated this possibility.

4. Not More Than 3 Non-Mu$£ims in Waqf Board

The court's ruling to limit non-Muslim representation to no more than three members on Waqf Boards strikes a balance between inclusivity and respect for community-led management while ensuring that Boards remain representative yet open to broader perspectives, diluting the influence of any extremist factions seeking to monopolize control. And...popcorns won't tell you that SC HAS NOT PUT ANY STAY ON NON-MU$£IMS BEING WAQF CEO. So indirectly, Govt still holds control on the Waqf Board.

So overall, I don't find any reason to get disappointed with today's verdict which has actually given guarantee that WAQF AMENDMENT ACT WILL STAY CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID. The hardcore I$£amists are running into a big trouble & Land Jih@d is finally heading to extinction.

SC HAS TAKEN OUT THE WIND OUT OF FAKE CAMPAIGN RUN BY SO-CALLED SECULARS AGAINST MODI SARKAR.

Never give knee-jerk reactions
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

There is hope yet

our guys haven't lost their sense of humor



Image


@RealPNavarro - Please note. This is what Brahmins do when they start making profit from selling Russian Oil.


Image
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

nutlick says

“India Brags that they have 1.4 Billion people, then why wouldn’t they buy one Bushel of corn from us"

Why? Because 90% of US Corn is Genetically modified industrially grown ethanol supported crap

If we allow that our Farming industry collapses



Image



But here’s the catch:
India is already the 5th largest corn producer in the world.
It even exports over 1.4 million tonnes of corn worth $440M+.
So why import American corn?


Image



Because most U.S. corn is Genetically Modified (GM).
India has banned GM corn imports over food safety + farmer protection.
Opening the doors could crush Indian farmers under cheap subsidized U.S. corn.
This is the real red line.



Image
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

The stupidity of these people are beyond imagination. When we have our own corn, why should we buy from the U.S?
Reminds me of Putin laughing at the suggestion of his minister suggesting they send Pork to Indonesia to alleviate dull sales in domestic market.
"Why Won't India Buy American Corn": Trump | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G
The US has a new complaint against India: why won’t India buy American corn? US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says the trade relationship is “one-way,” with India selling to the US but refusing to open its market. But India has three reasons for not importing US corn. First, it produces nearly as much as it consumes — about 42 million tonnes. Second, its limited imports come from Myanmar and Ukraine, suppliers of non-GM corn. Third, nearly all American corn is genetically modified, which India bans for food use. Talks may resume, but differences remain sharp.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges. Utter spinelessness of the political class. If the political class showed little bit determination, none of the Collegium or the elevation of such judges must have happened. Everything is allowed and then Hindus have to hear these abuses. Will they make an attempt at impeachment of such arrogant Hinduphobic judges? That also is doubtful. The new front has started work.
https://x.com/shashank_ssj/status/1967881092238807410
@shashank_ssj
A Hindu prays for the restoration of a beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu in Hindustan.

The matter is listed before Supreme Court.

Chief Justice of India, who identifies as a Neo-Buddha, not only declines to grant relief but even mocks the petitioner’s belief.

I would request the Chief Minister,
@DrMohanYadav51
ji, to intervene and restore the idol.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/ANI/status/1967839918962721026

@ANI
The Supreme Court stated that it will consider a batch of pleas filed seeking a stay on Anti-conversion laws that have been enacted and enforced in various states.

A bench of CJI B.R. Gavai and K. Vinod Chandran sought the response of various State governments to pleas challenging anti-conversion laws within a period of four weeks.

The Court has listed the matter to be heard next in six weeks
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9444
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

Check the thread

https://x.com/vijaygajera/status/1967840026185904445
2. In his PPT, on Page 4, Rahul has made the first claim that, ‘The Maharashtra results confirmed our suspicions about Mass Scale Vote Chori’

He has cited one of the articles from the Propaganda website, Newslaundry, as a reference.

However, there were numerous red flags!
3. Now read all these tweets. Tweets are full of hate against Hindus.

The words he has used for Hindus and Hinduism are so hateful that even algorithm is not allowed it to write.

The person behind this account is Vishal Vaibhav.
Image
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9444
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

https://x.com/vijaygajera/status/1967789200557871158
So Vishal Vaibhav ran away and deleted his X account!

And his co-author Sumedha has also locked her account.

Ironically, Rahul Gandhi’s PPT first reference was an article written by both of these people!
Image

Image
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14167
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Vayutuvan »

@vijayk gaaru, how do we know that account is being run by Vishal Vaibhav? Not that I will be surprised but just asking. If not, Vijaygajera account will lose credibility. I would be sorry to see that happening.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14167
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Vayutuvan »

uddu wrote: 16 Sep 2025 19:29 The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges.
Image
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14167
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Vayutuvan »

This is the murthy/vigraha that is being asked to be renovated. I would prefer a complete replica with head on its side with a board saying that it was defaced by the Islamic invaders. We should never forget and never forgive.

Image
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9444
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

Vayutuvan wrote: 17 Sep 2025 01:41 @vijayk gaaru, how do we know that account is being run by Vishal Vaibhav? Not that I will be surprised but just asking. If not, Vijaygajera account will lose credibility. I would be sorry to see that happening.
The fact that he works for NewsLaundry :rotfl:
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9444
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

Vayutuvan wrote: 17 Sep 2025 01:54
uddu wrote: 16 Sep 2025 19:29 The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges.
Image
కనకపు సింహాసనమున
శునకము గూర్చుండబెట్టి శుభలగ్నమునం
దొనరగ బట్టము గట్టిన
వెనుకటి గుణమేల మాను వినరా సుమతీ!

On a golden throne,
If a dog is seated at an auspicious moment,
And adorned with fine clothes,
Why would its innate nature change? Listen, O wise one!
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9444
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

Image
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/AshwiniVaishnaw/status/19 ... 7658010105
Most advanced chips of 2nm (used in AI servers, drones, mobile phones) to be designed/ developed by Arm in India. 🇮🇳
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

Opinion: IITs Must Advance Technology, Not Become Battlegrounds For Ideological Wars
https://www.news18.com/opinion/opinion- ... 76227.html

This is a time for course-correction. It should start from mandatory funding disclosures from foreign and local NGOs everywhere. The next step could be to acknowledge the issue of nepotism and implement the strict Conflict of Interest policies. For continued funding, some research output is required from humanities departments of IITs, IISERs, and NITs and these research outputs should align with the raison d’être of the technological institutes.

If humanities are such important subjects, the government would be better off by opening Indian Institute of Humanities rather than opening them under the label of IITs. Yes, some subjects of humanities need to be taught to engineering students as we need engineers with humanistic approach. However, for that purpose, contractual job or some permanent jobs under the existing departments will definitely work. IITs must remember that their strength lies in advancing technology, not in becoming battlegrounds for ideological wars.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

NARENDRA DAMODARDAS MODI- A PRIEST KING FOR A REASON

CM: 13 yrs, PM: 11 yrs

Assets

-Cash in Hand: ₹52920

-Bank Deposits: ₹73,304 in SBI Gandhinagar & ₹7000 in SBI Varanasi

-FDs: ₹1.27 Cr in SBI in 2019, with accrued interest ₹2.85 Cr

-NSC: ₹9.12 Lakh

-Jewellery: 4 gold rings worth ₹2.67 lakh (about $3,200 USD).

-Immovables: Zero

-Vehicles: Zero

-Scams: Zero

-Allegations faced: Hardcore Nationalist & Hindu

#HappyBdayPMModiJi
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

uddu wrote: 17 Sep 2025 12:18 Opinion: IITs Must Advance Technology, Not Become Battlegrounds For Ideological Wars
https://www.news18.com/opinion/opinion- ... 76227.html

This is a time for course-correction. It should start from mandatory funding disclosures from foreign and local NGOs everywhere. The next step could be to acknowledge the issue of nepotism and implement the strict Conflict of Interest policies. For continued funding, some research output is required from humanities departments of IITs, IISERs, and NITs and these research outputs should align with the raison d’être of the technological institutes.

If humanities are such important subjects, the government would be better off by opening Indian Institute of Humanities rather than opening them under the label of IITs. Yes, some subjects of humanities need to be taught to engineering students as we need engineers with humanistic approach. However, for that purpose, contractual job or some permanent jobs under the existing departments will definitely work. IITs must remember that their strength lies in advancing technology, not in becoming battlegrounds for ideological wars.

uddu ji,


IIT Bombay, in their PhD entrance exam asked a provocative question on Hindutva.

it's ok to study Hindutva but asking that question in a screening test is basically making sure only Hindu haters will be selected.

They asked about gramsci & Hindutva ... :lol:

Wonder if they will dare discuss what antonio gramsci had to say about the catholic church...or will that hit too close to home

This is blatant discrimination against honest students and a criminal waste of taxpayer's money


Image


Why is there a department of humanities in the IITs?

This crap was never envisaged in the original plan for the IITs.

Who allowed them in and why.......... :mrgreen:

IIT BOMBAY, GANDHINAGAR are in the news due to their pathetic and antinational humanities departments. These technical institutes, instead of concentrating on life changing technology development, have been reduced to harbouring dumbf(uk woke commie infested divisive puppets of LGBTQ and critical caste study agenda pushed by BIF funded NGOs often advocating separatist ideologies

Close these poisonous "departments" and kick the buggers out
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/narendramodi/status/1967955616636473471
@narendramodi
Had a very good conversation with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen of Denmark today. We reaffirmed our strong commitment to strengthening our Green Strategic Partnership and to an early conclusion of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement. Conveyed best wishes for Denmark’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union. Also discussed our shared interest in bringing an early end to the conflict in Ukraine.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

If you take it, I will reciprocate.
https://x.com/narendramodi/status/1968002939538088179
@narendramodi
Thank you, my friend, President Trump, for your phone call and warm greetings on my 75th birthday. Like you, I am also fully committed to taking the India-US Comprehensive and Global Partnership to new heights. We support your initiatives towards a peaceful resolution of the Ukraine conflict.

@POTUS


@realDonaldTrump
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2968
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

From Netanyahu, Rishi Sunak, to New Zealand PM, World leaders wish PM Modi on 75th birthday
World leaders wished Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his 75th birthday on Sept 17.
hanumadu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5382
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by hanumadu »

uddu wrote: 17 Sep 2025 12:16 https://x.com/AshwiniVaishnaw/status/19 ... 7658010105
Most advanced chips of 2nm (used in AI servers, drones, mobile phones) to be designed/ developed by Arm in India. 🇮🇳
Isn't manufacturing that is actually 2 nm? Does chips specifically need to be designed to enable them to use 2nm manufacturing? Do EDA tools also have to be specifically developed to design chips at a particular node?

All these companies like qualcomm, arm, apple have chip design centers in India. EDA tool makers like synopsis and cadence also have development centers in India. What sort of work is done in their India offices? Is it just grunt work or at least some advanced work is done? On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the most advanced stuff probably done in the US (or uk for ARM), what level is done in India? At least a 7 perhaps. Can we scale up to 10? Can Indian engineers working in these offshore sites develop matching software and hardware on their own if push comes to shove?

I know china has been trying to develop their own EDA tools without much success a few years back. Don't know what the situation is now.

LAM research which develops etching tools has a design center in India. Again grunt work or cutting edge?

We should have had atleast 24nm DUV lithograpgic machines by now. But then even Japanese don't have them.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35308
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
Post Reply