Modi 3.0 - Bharat

[uddu]

https://x.com/Vishnu_Jain1/status/1967523027563794619
@Vishnu_Jain1
The sc has stayed important provision sec 3(c) of Waqf amendment act,2025. Firstly the amendment act was itself was incomplete and a little relief which was given by the legislation pertaining to govt properties has also been stayed. The sc has trangressed its powers by staying the statute and this order is discriminatory. On waqf issue i do not agree either by the amendment (completely) or by the sc order. There was no hearing on waqf act, 1995.

[uddu]

As expected of him. SC in their hands now.
Firecracker ban across country? SC says ‘can’t have a policy just for Delhi’s elite residents’
https://www.financialexpress.com/india- ... s/3975789/
"I was in Amritsar last winter and the pollution there was worse than in Delhi," CJI BR Gavai said while hearing the matter.

[uddu]

Will Gavai will be the first to be impeached poking his nose into EC area.
Supreme Court warns Bihar SIR process may be annulled if illegalities are found in method
The Supreme Court warned that Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) could be set aside if any illegalities are found in its methodology. The bench emphasized that its final verdict will be comprehensive and apply nationwide. October 7 has been fixed for arguments, with the assumption that the Election Commission follows all legal norms.

[Sachin]

Key provisions of Waqf bill stayed

There are some caveats in the order as per this report. The court said the provision in Section 3(1)(r) that a person has to be practising Muslim for five years to create a waqf “shall remain stayed till rules are framed by the state for providing a mechanism for determining the question as to whether a person has been practising Islam for at least 5 years or not.” . Sec 3(1)(r) has been stayed till Rules are made out by the states. This would most likely to lead a situaition; where BJP strong hold states will bring in a stringent rule to prove one-self a Muslim to donate property to Waqf, where as "secular" states like Kerala would water down the rules and make that even a person drunk & sitting in a bar can just make a statement that he is a Muslim and that is valid proof.

On the reduction of collector's powers to determine the right over property the ruling is that "Unless the issue regarding the title to the Waqf property is not finally decided, no third-party rights can be created against any third party in respect of such properties ". So looks like the SC is batting for another court or tribunal which would be the final deciding authority and not the district collector. The way out for the government would be designate any civil court the power to hear appeals on the decrees from the Waqf Tribunal. Also note that the stay order also says that "no third party rights can be created" which means that the Waqf trust also would not be able alieante the property or allow third parties to claim any rights on the Waqf property when the enquiry is pending.

Also note; Provisions against Waqf by use has not been stayed. SC agreed with the contention of the government that this tactic was used to encroach on government lands. Also now Waqf board also has to follow the rules in the Limitation Act which sets a limit by when a suit to claim a property as Waqf has to be filed in a court. And also this stay is an interim stay. The hearings are not completed and the final decree is yet to be made.

[Tanaji]

Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….

[chetak]

[chetak]

Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….

Tanaji saar,

The whole legislation viz Waqf Act (1953, 1995, 2013) is unconstitutional.

It is a tool to islamise India, this is what gandhi & nehru wanted, and now congress & entire woke eco system is hell bent in doing .

Democracy dies when the unwashed unelected veto the elected.

[chetak]

[chetak]

Thanks Sachinji for the analysis, I was waiting for someone like you or Bar and Bench to comment….

VI@WA

SC has granted PARTIAL INTERIM STAY on SOME provisions of Waqf Amendment Act, but REFUSES to stay ENTIRE ACT.

Is it a setback to #Modi Sarkar? My Analysis

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO WORRY.

SC refusing outright stay indicates Prima Facie the Law is CONSTITUTIONAL.

Let's dive into details!

SC's ruling on Waqf Amendment Act is a significant victory for the Modi Sarkar, delivering a strong message AGAINST "I$£amist Land Jih@d." Here's how each provision of the ruling strengthens governance, promotes fairness & curbs misuse of Waqf system.

1. Partial Interim Stay on Specific Provisions, Not the Entire Act

Supreme Court's decision to avoid a blanket stay on Waqf Amendment Act is a resounding endorsement of Modi Sarkar's intent to reform Waqf system. By allowing most provisions to stand, SC has signalled confidence in Govt's broader vision to streamline and modernize Waqf management, ensuring it serves public interest. Big Blow to Land Jih@dis.

2. Stay on 5-Year I$£am Practitioner Requirement for Creating a Waqf

It appears to be a big blow to Modi Sarkar, but you need to read ahead how SC has played with Land Jih@dis.

5-YEAR PROVISION STAYED ONLY UNTIL STATE GOVERNMENTS FORMULATE RULES.

So NDA rules States are free to form their own rules, which will definitely align again with Modi Sarkar's Waqf Amendment Act & Land Jih@dis don't even get a chance to cry. About CHINDI ruled States? Let people decide which Govt they want. A NDA Govt that will SAVE their hard-earned & ancestral properties or a CHINDI Govt that will GIFT them away to Land Jih@dis.

3. Stay on the Power of the Collector.

Again seems to be setback, but good in the long run. Instead of concentrating power in the hands of Collector, matter is to be referred to the tribunal. It may become time-consuming, but those who know the power of CONgress formed ecosystem will understand how dangerous it would have been. What if CHINDIs come to power in a State? Every Govt appoints its 'trustworthy' bureaucrats in powerful positions & then you know what decision 'SUCH' Collector will deliver. SC has eliminated this possibility.

4. Not More Than 3 Non-Mu$£ims in Waqf Board

The court's ruling to limit non-Muslim representation to no more than three members on Waqf Boards strikes a balance between inclusivity and respect for community-led management while ensuring that Boards remain representative yet open to broader perspectives, diluting the influence of any extremist factions seeking to monopolize control. And...popcorns won't tell you that SC HAS NOT PUT ANY STAY ON NON-MU$£IMS BEING WAQF CEO. So indirectly, Govt still holds control on the Waqf Board.

So overall, I don't find any reason to get disappointed with today's verdict which has actually given guarantee that WAQF AMENDMENT ACT WILL STAY CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID. The hardcore I$£amists are running into a big trouble & Land Jih@d is finally heading to extinction.

SC HAS TAKEN OUT THE WIND OUT OF FAKE CAMPAIGN RUN BY SO-CALLED SECULARS AGAINST MODI SARKAR.

Never give knee-jerk reactions

[chetak]

[chetak]

There is hope yet

our guys haven't lost their sense of humor






@RealPNavarro - Please note. This is what Brahmins do when they start making profit from selling Russian Oil.

[chetak]

nutlick says

“India Brags that they have 1.4 Billion people, then why wouldn’t they buy one Bushel of corn from us"

Why? Because 90% of US Corn is Genetically modified industrially grown ethanol supported crap

If we allow that our Farming industry collapses






But here’s the catch:
India is already the 5th largest corn producer in the world.
It even exports over 1.4 million tonnes of corn worth $440M+.
So why import American corn?





Because most U.S. corn is Genetically Modified (GM).
India has banned GM corn imports over food safety + farmer protection.
Opening the doors could crush Indian farmers under cheap subsidized U.S. corn.
This is the real red line.

[uddu]

The stupidity of these people are beyond imagination. When we have our own corn, why should we buy from the U.S?
Reminds me of Putin laughing at the suggestion of his minister suggesting they send Pork to Indonesia to alleviate dull sales in domestic market.
"Why Won't India Buy American Corn": Trump | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G
The US has a new complaint against India: why won’t India buy American corn? US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says the trade relationship is “one-way,” with India selling to the US but refusing to open its market. But India has three reasons for not importing US corn. First, it produces nearly as much as it consumes — about 42 million tonnes. Second, its limited imports come from Myanmar and Ukraine, suppliers of non-GM corn. Third, nearly all American corn is genetically modified, which India bans for food use. Talks may resume, but differences remain sharp.

[uddu]

The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges. Utter spinelessness of the political class. If the political class showed little bit determination, none of the Collegium or the elevation of such judges must have happened. Everything is allowed and then Hindus have to hear these abuses. Will they make an attempt at impeachment of such arrogant Hinduphobic judges? That also is doubtful. The new front has started work.
https://x.com/shashank_ssj/status/1967881092238807410
@shashank_ssj
A Hindu prays for the restoration of a beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu in Hindustan.

The matter is listed before Supreme Court.

Chief Justice of India, who identifies as a Neo-Buddha, not only declines to grant relief but even mocks the petitioner’s belief.

I would request the Chief Minister,
@DrMohanYadav51
ji, to intervene and restore the idol.

[uddu]

https://x.com/ANI/status/1967839918962721026

@ANI
The Supreme Court stated that it will consider a batch of pleas filed seeking a stay on Anti-conversion laws that have been enacted and enforced in various states.

A bench of CJI B.R. Gavai and K. Vinod Chandran sought the response of various State governments to pleas challenging anti-conversion laws within a period of four weeks.

The Court has listed the matter to be heard next in six weeks

[vijayk]

Check the thread

https://x.com/vijaygajera/status/1967840026185904445

2. In his PPT, on Page 4, Rahul has made the first claim that, ‘The Maharashtra results confirmed our suspicions about Mass Scale Vote Chori’

He has cited one of the articles from the Propaganda website, Newslaundry, as a reference.

However, there were numerous red flags!

3. Now read all these tweets. Tweets are full of hate against Hindus.

The words he has used for Hindus and Hinduism are so hateful that even algorithm is not allowed it to write.

The person behind this account is Vishal Vaibhav.

[vijayk]

https://x.com/vijaygajera/status/1967789200557871158

So Vishal Vaibhav ran away and deleted his X account!

And his co-author Sumedha has also locked her account.

Ironically, Rahul Gandhi’s PPT first reference was an article written by both of these people!

[Vayutuvan]

@vijayk gaaru, how do we know that account is being run by Vishal Vaibhav? Not that I will be surprised but just asking. If not, Vijaygajera account will lose credibility. I would be sorry to see that happening.

[Vayutuvan]

The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges.

[Vayutuvan]

This is the murthy/vigraha that is being asked to be renovated. I would prefer a complete replica with head on its side with a board saying that it was defaced by the Islamic invaders. We should never forget and never forgive.

[vijayk]

@vijayk gaaru, how do we know that account is being run by Vishal Vaibhav? Not that I will be surprised but just asking. If not, Vijaygajera account will lose credibility. I would be sorry to see that happening.

The fact that he works for NewsLaundry

[vijayk]

The arrogance and Hinduphobia of the judges.

కనకపు సింహాసనమున
శునకము గూర్చుండబెట్టి శుభలగ్నమునం
దొనరగ బట్టము గట్టిన
వెనుకటి గుణమేల మాను వినరా సుమతీ!

On a golden throne,
If a dog is seated at an auspicious moment,
And adorned with fine clothes,
Why would its innate nature change? Listen, O wise one!

[vijayk]